Current Healthcare

The Valle de los Chillos already contains a government sponsored healthcare clinic. To understand why it’s not serving at least 60% of patients in the parroquia, and those who it is serving, incompletely; it is helpful to review the history of the healthcare system, and the national government, over the past twenty-five years.

When vast oil reserves were first discovered beneath Ecuador’s Amazon basin in the 1980’s it was thought that the future healthcare of all Ecuadorians was assured. A substantial amount of the revenues from the sale of oil were to be directed by law to the national health system which was charged with the care of over 97% of patients (less than 3% have any type of private health insurance.)

Indeed, to the politician’s credit, the (latest) 1998 version of the Ecuadorian National Constitution includes very strong language addressing the government’s responsibility to care for every aspect of its citizens health from birth to grave, including, “that all public health programs are to be free for all persons.”

Further laudable commitment to healthcare by the national government includes specific legislation outlining patient’s rights to receive free prenatal, obstetric, pediatric, dental and other types of care.

Financially, the Ecuadorian government’s total expenditure on health as a percentage of the gross domestic product is 5.1%, or $220 U.S. dollars per person, per year. This ranks far behind the U.S. at 15.1%, ($5,711)but is ahead of such neighboring countries in the World Health Organization’s Region of the Americas, including Venezuela at 4.5% and Peru with 4.4%.

Ecuador’s national health system also benefits from some direct, government-to-government foreign aid, 0.9% for the last published year of 2003. The largest donor to this sector is the United States Agency for International Development, or USAID, with 22 million dollars earmarked for a variety of credible healthcare programs for the calendar year 2006, a reduction of roughly 50 percent from the previous calendar year.

Despite such forward-thinking healthcare legislation, and the commitment of real resources at the national budgetary level, Ecuador has been less than successful at meeting its healthcare goals. Indeed, the national health service has been in a chronic state of under-funding with widespread shortages of even the most basic medicines, equipment, and personnel in state hospital and clinics for the past decade. Health workers receiving under the table payments above the normal service cost to provide better, or more timely care, is widespread. Subcentros de salud all over the country sit closed for lack of funding. The Ministry of Health is short 200 physicians and the funding to pay them for its hospitals in Quito.

The shortage of health professionals is much more severe in outlying, rural areas. Ironically, many well-qualified Ecuadorian physicians, and other healthcare professionals, seek better payment employment outside of the field of medicine to support their families, or are attracted to much better paying healthcare positions in other Spanish speaking countries such as Chile, Mexico, and Spain.

To understand some of the national health service’s shortcomings, why so many people simply are unable to get even the most basic medical care, it is necessary to understand how Ecuador, like many developing countries in the world, has been hampered by a history of instability and corruption.

After the discovery of large oil reserves in the Amazon rainforests of eastern Ecuador in the 1980’s, successive national governments began to spend heavily on all sectors of the economy, including such social programs such as healthcare. It seemed a sure thing, the reserves of oil were large, and the price of oil seemed only to rise. Governments borrowed heavily to pay for development projects, in many cases questionable ones that benefited primarily members of the government and their associates.

An outbreak of war with neighboring Peru over ownership of some of the now valuable Amazon territories initiated a further budgetary strain. Governments borrowed further large sums to finance illegal shipments of often defective weapons from neighboring countries Argentina and Chile, in what turned into a protracted and unwinable war with Peru.

Servicing a huge debt to foreign governments and banks, the country was ill-prepared in terms of financial reserves to meet the collapse of the Asian, and then most Latin American, financial markets, in 1998. This was closely followed by a drop in world oil prices, sinking an economy that had been taking on water. The country’s currency, the Sucre, lost so much value that many large national and private banks refused to accept it as payment for debt. In order to stave off complete economic collapse, the country abolished its own currency in favor of using only the U.S. dollar for all transactions. Millions of people who had their money in banks lost most their savings overnight through devaluation.

This period of economic instability heralded political volatility, as different political parties, and national institutions including the military, began to struggle over who was to blame for the state of the country; and who would control its rich resources. Seven presidents in eight years followed, emblematic of the instability of the political process in Ecuador. The effect of this on government run programs, including healthcare, has been direct and destabilizing. One especially insidious effect has been that with each change of Presidents, through presidential patronage, all appointed health ministry positions are filled with the new president’s supporters. This has included changing thousands of officials from every level of the healthcare system, from top to bottom, seven times in eight years! Most officials have hardly had a chance to learn their jobs, before being replaced.

Instability in Ecuador’s government sector has also affected healthcare delivery by promoting corruption. Transparency International, the Berlin based non profit, compiles an annual Corruptions Perceptions Index devoted to ranking countries by their level of corruption from 10 to zero. The cleanest countries get the highest score and place first on the list. Ecuador scored a 2.5, ranking it 117th in the world, tied with Afghanistan. Both were edged out by the Palestinian Authority which scored a 2.6. That means, that despite whatever money is budgeted for national healthcare, and however favorably that may compare with some of Ecuador’s neighbors, that without effective management and oversight of that money, a huge percentage of it “disappears” before it reaches those it was intended to help.

“Corruption is a major cause of poverty as well as a barrier to overcoming it. The two scourges feed off each other, locking their populations in a cycle of misery. Corruption must be vigorously addressed if aid is to make a real difference in freeing people from poverty.”
Transparency International

Unfortunately, the very nature of healthcare systems makes them especially vulnerable to corruption in all countries. Specifically, healthcare involves uncertainty, as people cannot predict when they will need it. Information is asymmetric meaning not all information is shared between patients, providers, and healthcare systems. Finally, there are a large number of players involved in the healthcare system, including providers, administrators, pharmaceutical companies, equipment suppliers, regulators, payers, et. al.; opening up the system for corruption on many different levels by many different parties, each with differing agendas.

Transparency International reports in its special report on healthcare corruption “that three factors, uncertainty, asymmetric sharing of information, and a large number of players, all create systematic opportunities for corruption. These three factors combine to divide information among different actors – regulators, payers, providers, patients and suppliers – in ways that make the system vulnerable to corruption and that hinder transparency and accountability.”

Specifically, “in the case of direct public provision of health care services [such as Ecuador] the most common forms of abuse involve kickbacks and graft in procurement, theft, illegally charging patients, diverting patients to private practice, reducing or compromising the quality of care, and absenteeism.” Read about the Causes of Corruption in Health Sector here.

Read the Parroquia of Cotogchoa’s official 10 year development plan for the years 2002 – 2012.